Skip to main contentSkip to search
Episciences
Open Access Journals
Sign in(new window)
Discrete Mathematics & Theoretical Computer Science logo
Discrete Mathematics & Theoretical Computer Science
Discrete Mathematics & Theoretical Computer Science logo
Discrete Mathematics & Theoretical Computer Science
Sign in(new window)
Articles & Issues
All articlesAll accepted articlesAll volumesLast volumeSectionsSpecial issuesAuthors
About
The journalIndexing
Boards
Publish
For authorsEthical charter
Submit
Discrete Mathematics & Theoretical Computer Science logo
Contact
|
Credits
eISSN 1365-8050
|
RSS
|
Atom
Episciences
Documentation
|
Acknowledgements
|
Publishing policy
Accessibility: non-compliant
|
Legal mentions
|
Privacy statement
|
Terms of use
  1. Home > Articles & Issues >
  2. Articles >
  3. $2$-polarity and alg ...
Article

$2$-polarity and algorithmic aspects of polarity variants on cograph superclasses

Fernando Esteban Contreras-Mendoza ORCID, César Hernández-Cruz
Download article
Open on arXiv
Submitted on
June 19, 2023
Accepted on
September 9, 2024
Published on
October 10, 2024
Last modified on
March 27, 2025
Volume 26
vol. 26:3
Graph Theory
DOI
10.46298/dmtcs.11479
License
arXiv.org - Non-exclusive license to distribute
Indicators
882
Views
917
Downloads

$2$-polarity and algorithmic aspects of polarity variants on cograph superclasses

Fernando Esteban Contreras-Mendoza ORCID, César Hernández-Cruz
Abstract
A graph $G$ is said to be an $(s, k)$-polar graph if its vertex set admits a partition $(A, B)$ such that $A$ and $B$ induce, respectively, a complete $s$-partite graph and the disjoint union of at most $k$ complete graphs. Polar graphs and monopolar graphs are defined as $(\infty, \infty)$- and $(1, \infty)$-polar graphs, respectively, and unipolar graphs are those graphs with a polar partition $(A, B)$ such that $A$ is a clique. The problems of deciding whether an arbitrary graph is a polar graph or a monopolar graph are known to be NP-complete. In contrast, deciding whether a graph is a unipolar graph can be done in polynomial time. In this work we prove that the three previous problems can be solved in linear time on the classes of $P_4$-sparse and $P_4$-extendible graphs, generalizing analogous results previously known for cographs. Additionally, we provide finite forbidden subgraph characterizations for $(2,2)$-polar graphs on $P_4$-sparse and $P_4$-extendible graphs, also generalizing analogous results recently obtained for the class of cographs. Comment: 39 pages, 14 figures
Keywords
  • Mathematics - Combinatorics
  • 05C75, 05C15, 05C85, 68R10
Mathematics Subject Classification 2020
  • 05C15 - Coloring of graphs and hypergraphs
  • 05C42 - Density (toughness, etc.)
  • 05C70 - Edge subsets with special properties (factorization, matching, partitioning, covering and packing, etc.)
  • 05C75 - Structural characterization of families of graphs
  • 05C85 - Graph algorithms (graph-theoretic aspects)
  • 68R10 - Graph theory (including graph drawing) in computer science
Cited by

Source: OpenCitations

  • Minimal Obstructions for Polarity, Monopolarity, Unipolarity and (s, 1)-Polarity in Generalizations of Cographs

    Graphs and Combinatorics

    Authors : Fernando Esteban Contreras-Mendoza ORCID, César Hernández-Cruz ORCID

    Journal reference : Volume 40, 2024, pp.

    DOI : 10.1007/s00373-024-02784-7
Preview
Loading PDF preview...