Discrete Mathematics & Theoretical Computer Science |

6013

Edmonds, LovĂˇsz, and Pulleyblank showed that if a matching covered graph has a nontrivial tight cut, then it also has a nontrivial ELP-cut. Carvalho et al. gave a stronger conjecture: if a matching covered graph has a nontrivial tight cut $C$, then it also has a nontrivial ELP-cut that does not cross $C$. Chen, et al gave a proof of the conjecture. This note is inspired by the paper of Carvalho et al. We give a simplified proof of the conjecture, and prove the following result which is slightly stronger than the conjecture: if a nontrivial tight cut $C$ of a matching covered graph $G$ is not an ELP-cut, then there is a sequence $G_1=G, G_2,\ldots,G_r, r\geq2$ of matching covered graphs, such that for $i=1, 2,\ldots, r-1$, $G_i$ has an ELP-cut $C_i$, and $G_{i+1}$ is a $C_i$-contraction of $G_i$, and $C$ is a $2$-separation cut of $G_r$.

Source : oai:arXiv.org:2001.01190

Volume: vol. 23 no. 1

Section: Graph Theory

Published on: June 14, 2021

Accepted on: May 28, 2021

Submitted on: January 8, 2020

Keywords: Mathematics - Combinatorics

Source : ScholeXplorer
HasVersion DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2001.01190- 10.48550/arxiv.2001.01190
Zhao, Xiao ; Chen, Sheng ; |

This page has been seen 268 times.

This article's PDF has been downloaded 113 times.